In August of 2006, I broke my foot in three places while riding my horse. I went the hospital where I was x-rayed. I saw a doctor who said that I would probably have to have surgery to fix it. I was put in a compression cast the next day for the swelling. I stayed in the compression cast for ten days. Then, I was x-rayed again. I was told that I would just need a cast. I had the cast for 6 weeks and then wore a boot for 3. A week after being out of my boot, my foot was stepped on. I went back to the doctor that had told me that I didn't need surgery. He x-rayed it and said that it wasn't broken. Therefore, I continued with my normal activities (playing tennis, riding horses, etc). I continued to have burning pain, numbness and swelling in my foot. In January, it broke when my brother touched it. I went to the doctor and found out that it HAD been broken in October and it had been rebroken. The bone had become infected from not being set and died. It had also started to rot. I spent four months looking for a doctor to operate on it. I found out during this time that the doctor that told me it wasn't broke had actually written down on his notes that it was. I had to have a bone graft and had two screws put in. Medical malpractice case?:confused:Reply Follow This Thread Stop Following This Thread Flag this Discussion
Know the five types of psoriasis and how to spot flares.
Newer diabetes treatments can suppress appetite and aid weight loss.
Try these tips to get your salivary glands back into action.
Constipation is a common side effect of opioid and narcotic pain medicines.
Is it sensitive skin or something else?