In Sept. 2006 I was diagnosed with lung cancer. Surgery was scheduled (non-laparoscopic) with a segment of upper right lung identified and resected. At this time other sternal/thoracic tissue was also extracted from various suspect lymph nodes, several of which were removed.
Having received a dismal and wrenching prognosis, I specifically asked about risk of miscalculation, and estimate for projected outcome should I elect to decline. More than two months elapsed before the surgery could be scheduled, owed, I was told, to existing demands on surgeon/staff, and hospital time constraints. My choice in this matter, I was told, was either adapt or seek intervention elsewhere and also replace my physician. A prior consensus determined needle biopsy of the anomaly, prior to planned resection, either had been unneeded or simply unjustified. In any case, with respect to this commonly used diagnostic tool, I wasn’t presented the option nor did I ever decline.
The actual surgery was covered by private insurance. The policy through this insurer has since become unavailable to me and was replaced by the employer for reasons I do not know. One of the questions asked by the current insurer is whether or not the condition is related to any malpractice. Both due to conditions I have developed resulting from this procedure, as well as exacerbates, I fear being dropped by my insurer and excluded from future insurance.
When the procedure took place the mass on extraction was discovered to be a granuloma with necrosis -- Basically an infection.
It is worthy of note, I had reasonably considered initial consultation a valid second-opinion, having received elsewhere and prior failed treatment for recurrent bronchial infection. Needless to say, it is unlikely in retrospect I would consider it now to be so.
While the initial situation has long stabilized, it has since grown increasingly complex owing to circumstances with which I believe exist unmistakable correlation. My primary physician initially suggested this, and was in no way influenced by anything I have said. As for the condition/s, each to varying degrees inhibit mobility, are disfiguring, and contribute overall to a diminished quality of life through robbing me of my routine. I now experience a life-altering array of maladies with which I no longer can contend.
I am wondering whether I, along with some possibly others, may simply have been scammed, all with the help of a benevolent insurer, who, not only can on a whim deny or exclude coverage ¾ but who in fact can conspire setting insureds up for more of the future same!
Know the five types of psoriasis and how to spot flares.
Newer diabetes treatments can suppress appetite and aid weight loss.
Try these tips to get your salivary glands back into action.
Constipation is a common side effect of opioid and narcotic pain medicines.
Is it sensitive skin or something else?