is it possible for the body to allow infection to take over without fever?
3 weeks ago my throat got sore,swollen, scarlett red with pronounced red veins and an oval patch of lighter red in the back wall(similiar to a blister without the top layer). The glands are swollen on both sides and painfull but i had no fever. The DR.gave me amoxicillan 875 mg 2x daily. (i misread the bottle and only took it 1x daily but probably for the better) I got severe vomiting,diarhea,and abdominal pain. after 1 week i found a post on here about C-diff and it matched my symptoms so i stopped the amoxicillan-got better very fast. I am now taking azithromyacin but feel no different yet, meanwhile- my throat is still as terrible as originally with the awful glands and now trouble swallowing.(swelling) i ve been having severe haedaches, neck pain and stiffness, eye pain and vision problems, dizzyness, cold symptoms, bloody mucus---and still no fever!( after 3 weeks of swollen glands especially?)
I thought that the body was supposed to create fever as a sign of fighting off infection, am i wrong? what could this be?
Recognize the risks associated with Crohn’s disease.
Did you know that one in six US adults has high cholesterol?
Know the five types of psoriasis and how to spot flares.
Newer diabetes treatments can suppress appetite and aid weight loss.
Try these tips to get your salivary glands back into action.
Constipation is a common side effect of opioid and narcotic pain medicines.
Is it sensitive skin or something else?